Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPFFX vs TRGLX
NPFFX vs TRGLX Comparison
Open Charts NPFFX vs TRGLX
NPFFX vs TRGLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPFFX vs. TRGLX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPFFX is a Hold and TRGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. TRGLX (7.97B). NPFFX pays higher dividends than TRGLX: NPFFX (0.92) vs TRGLX (0.25). NPFFX was incepted earlier than TRGLX: NPFFX (25 years) vs TRGLX (9 years). NPFFX (0.77) is less costly to investors than TRGLX (0.66). TRGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 172.20 vs. NPFFX (23.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRGLX: NPFFX (250) vs TRGLX (500000). TRGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.42 vs. NPFFX (5.26). NPFFX return over 5 years is better than : 11.17 vs. TRGLX (7.37).
| NPFFX | TRGLX | NPFFX / TRGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.66 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.66 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.958 | 10.498 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170B | 7.97B | 2,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.25 | 363% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.26 | 11.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.70 | 40.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.17 | 7.37 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers