Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPSGX vs WCMLX
NPSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NPSGX vs WCMLX
Nicholas Partners Small Cap Gr Instl
Price$17.41
Change+$0.13 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets126.25M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.58
Change+$0.21 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.98M
NPSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPSGX has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. WCMLX (45M). NPSGX pays higher dividends than WCMLX: NPSGX (0.76) vs WCMLX (0.00). NPSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NPSGX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NPSGX (1.08). NPSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 138.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NPSGX (5000) vs WCMLX (100000). NPSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.17 vs. WCMLX (6.59). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 20.93 vs. NPSGX (19.09).
| NPSGX | WCMLX | NPSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.79 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.704 | 5.599 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 126M | 45M | 280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.17 | 6.59 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.64 | 28.23 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.09 | 20.93 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement