Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NPSGX vs WCMLX
NPSGX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NPSGX vs WCMLX
NPSGX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NPSGX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NPSGX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPSGX has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. WCMLX (53.1M). NPSGX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NPSGX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NPSGX (7 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NPSGX (1.06). NPSGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NPSGX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NPSGX (5000) vs WCMLX (100000). NPSGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.12 vs. WCMLX (25.84). NPSGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.76 vs. WCMLX (-0.07).
| NPSGX | WCMLX | NPSGX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.79 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.280 | 9.375 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 100000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 183M | 53.1M | 345% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.12 | 25.84 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.53 | 32.13 | 251% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.76 | -0.07 | -23,730% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement