Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCAX vs RMEBX
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCAX vs RMEBX
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCAX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NQCAX (72.2M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCAX: RMEBX (1.04) vs NQCAX (0.84). NQCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCAX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCAX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCAX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCAX (2500). NQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.20 vs. RMEBX (9.11). NQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.17 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| NQCAX | RMEBX | NQCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.722 | 6.308 | 281% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.04 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.20 | 9.11 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.71 | 34.37 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.17 | 34.74 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.44 | 94.33 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement