Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCAX vs RMEBX
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCAX vs RMEBX
NQCAX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCAX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCAX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCAX (73M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCAX: RMEBX (1.00) vs NQCAX (0.82). NQCAX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCAX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCAX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCAX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCAX (2500). NQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.59 vs. RMEBX (8.73). NQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 44.00 vs. RMEBX (36.28).
| NQCAX | RMEBX | NQCAX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.07 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.807 | 9.059 | 208% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.82 | 1.00 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.59 | 8.73 | 270% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.91 | 34.30 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.00 | 36.28 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.84 | 89.36 | -2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers