Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCAX vs RMFCX
NQCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NQCAX vs RMFCX
NQCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCAX (79.4M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NQCAX: RMFCX (1.15) vs NQCAX (0.80). NQCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NQCAX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NQCAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCAX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCAX: RMFCX (250) vs NQCAX (2500). NQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.21 vs. RMFCX (9.14). NQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.09 vs. RMFCX (36.70).
| NQCAX | RMFCX | NQCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.91 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.604 | 10.454 | 216% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.4M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.15 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.21 | 9.14 | 276% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.89 | 38.82 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.09 | 36.70 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.03 | 92.27 | -0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers