Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCAX vs RMFCX
NQCAX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NQCAX vs RMFCX
NQCAX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCAX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCAX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. NQCAX (69.5M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NQCAX: RMFCX (1.19) vs NQCAX (0.84). NQCAX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NQCAX (19 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NQCAX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCAX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCAX: RMFCX (250) vs NQCAX (2500). NQCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.69 vs. RMFCX (10.10). NQCAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. RMFCX (33.85).
| NQCAX | RMFCX | NQCAX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.91 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.91 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.190 | 5.845 | 260% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 69.5M | 115B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.19 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.69 | 10.10 | 284% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.74 | 34.65 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.70 | 33.85 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.81 | 91.46 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement