Ad is loading...
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities C
Price$3.45
Change-$0.20 (-5.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.98M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.45
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. NQCCX (22M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.18) vs NQCCX (1.08). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (18 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). NQCCX (2.36) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). NQCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. NQCCX (4.59). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 74.87 vs. NQCCX (49.24).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.36 | 1.07 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.241 | 2.774 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.18 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.59 | 6.63 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.15 | 11.00 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.24 | 74.87 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | -66.72 | 63.22 | -106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...