Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMEBX
NQCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCCX (73.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs NQCCX (0.25). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCCX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCCX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. RMEBX (6.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. NQCCX (25.90).
| NQCCX | RMEBX | NQCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 1.07 | 220% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.342 | 8.533 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.00 | 25% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.41 | 6.88 | 268% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.19 | 30.86 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.90 | 35.24 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.01 | 88.54 | -29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement