Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCCX vs RMFEX
NQCCX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts NQCCX vs RMFEX
NQCCX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCCX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCCX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCCX (73.3M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than NQCCX: RMFEX (1.42) vs NQCCX (0.25). NQCCX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: NQCCX (20 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). NQCCX (2.35) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCCX (25.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCCX: RMFEX (250) vs NQCCX (2500). NQCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.41 vs. RMFEX (7.35). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.33 vs. NQCCX (25.90).
| NQCCX | RMFEX | NQCCX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.75 | 0.62 | 282% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.35 | 0.62 | 379% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.342 | 8.793 | 209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.42 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.41 | 7.35 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.19 | 32.64 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.90 | 38.33 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.01 | 98.32 | -26% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement