Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCFX vs RGAHX
NQCFX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NQCFX vs RGAHX
NQCFX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCFX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCFX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NQCFX (11M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NQCFX: RGAHX (0.40) vs NQCFX (0.00). NQCFX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NQCFX (25 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). NQCFX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RGAHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NQCFX (11.83). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: RGAHX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). NQCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RGAHX (0.18). NQCFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.83 vs. RGAHX (13.78).
| NQCFX | RGAHX | NQCFX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.44 | 318% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.44 | 318% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.086 | 9.200 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | 0.18 | 7,299% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 43.47 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.83 | 13.78 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.06 | 106.68 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement