Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCFX vs RGEBX
NQCFX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCFX vs RGEBX
NQCFX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCFX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCFX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. NQCFX (11M). NQCFX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NQCFX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NQCFX (25 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). NQCFX (1.40) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NQCFX (11.83). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCFX: RGEBX (250) vs NQCFX (1000). NQCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.11 vs. RGEBX (-0.77). NQCFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.83 vs. RGEBX (9.71).
| NQCFX | RGEBX | NQCFX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.08 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.08 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.086 | 8.727 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11M | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.11 | -0.77 | -1,694% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.02 | 39.77 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.83 | 9.71 | 266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.06 | 97.58 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement