Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCRX (79.6M). RMEBX (0.99) and NQCRX (0.99) have matching dividends . NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCRX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.52 vs. RMEBX (9.66). NQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 48.22 vs. RMEBX (36.72).
| NQCRX | RMEBX | NQCRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.508 | 11.521 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.6M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.99 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.52 | 9.66 | 275% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.13 | 38.05 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.22 | 36.72 | 131% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.34 | 93.11 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement