Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NQCRX (72.2M). RMEBX (1.04) and NQCRX (1.03) have matching dividends . NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCRX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.56 vs. RMEBX (9.11). NQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. RMEBX (34.74).
| NQCRX | RMEBX | NQCRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.889 | 6.308 | 284% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.04 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.56 | 9.11 | 325% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.31 | 34.37 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.45 | 34.74 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.01 | 94.33 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement