Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMEBX
NQCRX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCRX (73.3M). NQCRX (1.01) and RMEBX (1.00) have matching dividends . NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NQCRX (20 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). NQCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMEBX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.09 vs. RMEBX (7.56). NQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.20 vs. RMEBX (36.13).
| NQCRX | RMEBX | NQCRX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 1.07 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.426 | 9.246 | 199% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.00 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.09 | 7.56 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.42 | 31.88 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.20 | 36.13 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.29 | 89.32 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement