Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMFCX
NQCRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMFCX
NQCRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. NQCRX (73.3M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NQCRX: RMFCX (1.16) vs NQCRX (1.01). NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NQCRX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NQCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMFCX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.09 vs. RMFCX (7.69). NQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.20 vs. RMFCX (37.08).
| NQCRX | RMFCX | NQCRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.426 | 9.325 | 198% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.3M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.16 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.09 | 7.69 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.42 | 32.42 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.20 | 37.08 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.29 | 91.03 | 0% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement