Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQCRX vs RMFCX
NQCRX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts NQCRX vs RMFCX
NQCRX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQCRX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQCRX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NQCRX (72.2M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than NQCRX: RMFCX (1.19) vs NQCRX (1.03). NQCRX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: NQCRX (20 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). NQCRX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NQCRX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQCRX: RMFCX (250) vs NQCRX (100000). NQCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.56 vs. RMFCX (9.24). NQCRX return over 5 years is better than : 46.45 vs. RMFCX (35.66).
| NQCRX | RMFCX | NQCRX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.889 | 6.368 | 281% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.2M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.19 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.56 | 9.24 | 320% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.31 | 34.91 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.45 | 35.66 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.01 | 96.09 | 6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement