Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$41.40
Change+$0.11 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets148.47M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.74
Change+$0.18 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.42B
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.42B vs. NQGCX (148M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.23) vs TEDSX (0.85). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). NQGCX (2.02) and TEDSX (1.96) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (30.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. TEDSX (2.36). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 87.22 vs. TEDSX (35.69).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.96 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.96 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.040 | 15.996 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 9.42B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.85 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.34 | 2.36 | 776% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.28 | 27.76 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 87.22 | 35.69 | 244% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.57 | 8.62 | 1,004% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers