Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$40.94
Change-$0.20 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.64M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$31.83
Change-$0.10 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.17B
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.17B vs. NQGCX (147M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.23) vs TEDSX (0.75). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). NQGCX (2.02) and TEDSX (1.96) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (30.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.67 vs. TEDSX (1.75). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.54 vs. TEDSX (22.33).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.96 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.96 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.601 | 13.751 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 9.17B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.23 | 0.75 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.67 | 1.75 | 1,127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.86 | 14.52 | 357% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.54 | 22.33 | 338% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.20 | 5.23 | 1,590% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers