Ad is loading...
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$35.27
Change-$1.02 (-2.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.6M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$29.54
Change-$0.96 (-3.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.12B
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.12B vs. NQGCX (135M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.41) vs TEDSX (0.92). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). NQGCX (2.02) and TEDSX (1.96) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.47 vs. NQGCX (27.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.68 vs. TEDSX (-1.74). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 107.90 vs. TEDSX (53.01).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.96 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.96 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.313 | 8.657 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135M | 9.12B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.41 | 0.92 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.68 | -1.74 | -672% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.15 | 0.67 | 3,306% |
| Returns for 5 years | 107.90 | 53.01 | 204% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.30 | -6.44 | -859% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers