Ad is loading...
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$34.37
Change+$0.24 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$27.90
Change-$2.45 (-8.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Buy and TEDSX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 7.94B vs. NQGCX (131M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.60) vs TEDSX (0.40). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (15 years) vs TEDSX (32 years). TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.47 vs. NQGCX (29.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.03 vs. TEDSX (-4.99). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.44 vs. TEDSX (-5.96).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.601 | -5.692 | -186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131M | 7.94B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.60 | 0.40 | 402% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.03 | -4.99 | -241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | -6.33 | -249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.44 | -5.96 | -629% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.06 | -11.59 | -441% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers