Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
Nuveen Global Equity Income C
Price$40.42
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.56M
Franklin Mutual Global Discovery C
Price$32.25
Change+$0.08 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.29B
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 9.29B vs. NQGCX (147M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.22) vs TEDSX (0.90). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (16 years) vs TEDSX (33 years). NQGCX (2.02) and TEDSX (1.96) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.55 vs. NQGCX (27.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.43 vs. TEDSX (3.12). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 82.60 vs. TEDSX (31.60).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.96 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.02 | 1.96 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.084 | 14.606 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147M | 9.29B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 0.90 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.43 | 3.12 | 688% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.08 | 9.83 | 499% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.60 | 31.60 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.72 | 0.59 | 12,651% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement