Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison
Open Charts NQGCX vs TEDSX
NQGCX vs TEDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NQGCX vs. TEDSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NQGCX is a Hold and TEDSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TEDSX has more cash in the bank: 8.98B vs. NQGCX (166M). NQGCX pays higher dividends than TEDSX: NQGCX (1.33) vs TEDSX (0.81). NQGCX was incepted earlier than TEDSX: NQGCX (17 years) vs TEDSX (34 years). NQGCX (1.99) and TEDSX (1.95) have similar cost to investors . TEDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.28 vs. NQGCX (30.00). TEDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than NQGCX: TEDSX (1000) vs NQGCX (2500). NQGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.14 vs. TEDSX (2.01). NQGCX return over 5 years is better than : 62.96 vs. TEDSX (0.33).
| NQGCX | TEDSX | NQGCX / TEDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 1.95 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.99 | 1.95 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.685 | 0.064 | 13,591% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 8.98B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 0.81 | 165% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.14 | 2.01 | 1,201% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.18 | 11.19 | 574% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.96 | 0.33 | 19,195% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.32 | 18.12 | 703% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement