Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRACX vs RWEBX
NRACX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs RWEBX
NRACX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRACX (4.74B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRACX: RWEBX (0.75) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRACX (17 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). NRACX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRACX (10.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: RWEBX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.54 vs. RWEBX (6.67). RWEBX (25.30) and NRACX (24.13) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NRACX | RWEBX | NRACX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.06 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.06 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.286 | 6.089 | 235% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.74B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.54 | 6.67 | 338% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.50 | 31.06 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.13 | 25.30 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.46 | 73.95 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement