Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRACX vs RWMFX
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs RWMFX
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NRACX (4.82B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NRACX: RWMFX (1.44) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NRACX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NRACX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRACX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: RWMFX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.76 vs. RWMFX (5.76). RWMFX (28.02) and NRACX (27.12) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NRACX | RWMFX | NRACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.31 | 581% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.31 | 581% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.648 | 3.858 | 406% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.76 | 5.76 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.17 | 29.17 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.12 | 28.02 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.89 | 77.65 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement