Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRACX vs RWMFX
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NRACX vs RWMFX
NRACX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRACX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRACX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRACX (4.71B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NRACX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NRACX (0.00). NRACX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NRACX (17 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NRACX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRACX (10.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NRACX: RWMFX (250) vs NRACX (1000). NRACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.13 vs. RWMFX (2.09). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. NRACX (25.60).
| NRACX | RWMFX | NRACX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.31 | 581% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.31 | 581% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.910 | 4.508 | 331% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.41 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.13 | 2.09 | 917% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.08 | 30.24 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.60 | 27.39 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.59 | 82.36 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement