Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRARX vs RWEBX
NRARX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRARX vs RWEBX
NRARX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRARX vs. RWEBX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRARX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRARX (4.71B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRARX: RWEBX (0.74) vs NRARX (0.00). NRARX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRARX (17 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). NRARX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NRARX (10.00). NRARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: NRARX (0) vs RWEBX (250). NRARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.85 vs. RWEBX (1.26). NRARX return over 5 years is better than : 29.98 vs. RWEBX (23.43).
| NRARX | RWEBX | NRARX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.06 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.06 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.308 | 3.934 | 389% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.71B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.74 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.85 | 1.26 | 1,572% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.33 | 27.16 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.98 | 23.43 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.36 | 75.35 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement