Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NREMX vs RNWAX
NREMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts NREMX vs RNWAX
NREMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NREMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NREMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90B vs. NREMX (217M). RNWAX pays higher dividends than NREMX: RNWAX (0.49) vs NREMX (0.05). NREMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: NREMX (14 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than NREMX (1.14). NREMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). NREMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWAX: NREMX (0) vs RNWAX (250). NREMX (16.58) and RNWAX (15.91) have marching annual gain over last year. NREMX return over 5 years is better than : 29.03 vs. RNWAX (12.78).
| NREMX | RNWAX | NREMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.66 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.004 | 15.694 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 217M | 90B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.05 | 0.49 | 11% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.58 | 15.91 | 104% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 49.14 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.03 | 12.78 | 227% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.24 | 101.85 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement