Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NREMX vs RNWBX
NREMX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts NREMX vs RNWBX
NREMX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NREMX vs. RNWBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NREMX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. NREMX (222M). RNWBX pays higher dividends than NREMX: RNWBX (0.41) vs NREMX (0.06). NREMX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: NREMX (13 years) vs RNWBX (24 years). RNWBX (1.66) is less costly to investors than NREMX (1.14). NREMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWBX (46.00). NREMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: NREMX (0) vs RNWBX (250). NREMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.96 vs. RNWBX (18.14). NREMX return over 5 years is better than : 20.29 vs. RNWBX (9.30).
| NREMX | RNWBX | NREMX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.66 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.66 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.927 | 12.082 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 222M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.41 | 13% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.96 | 18.14 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.82 | 39.22 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.29 | 9.30 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.47 | 97.97 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement