Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs PQSCX
NRGSX vs PQSCX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs PQSCX
NRGSX vs PQSCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. PQSCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and PQSCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. PQSCX (567M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than PQSCX: NRGSX (0.45) vs PQSCX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than PQSCX: NRGSX (13 years) vs PQSCX (20 years). PQSCX (1.99) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). NRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. PQSCX (12.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than PQSCX: NRGSX (0) vs PQSCX (2500). NRGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.20 vs. PQSCX (-3.16). PQSCX return over 5 years is better than : -10.67 vs. NRGSX (-18.93).
| NRGSX | PQSCX | NRGSX / PQSCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.99 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.99 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.543 | 8.257 | 200% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 567M | 1,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.20 | -3.16 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.14 | 10.07 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.93 | -10.67 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.86 | 53.34 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers