Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs TCMSX
NRGSX vs TCMSX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs TCMSX
NRGSX vs TCMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. TCMSX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and TCMSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. TCMSX (2.08B). NRGSX pays higher dividends than TCMSX: NRGSX (0.44) vs TCMSX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than TCMSX: NRGSX (14 years) vs TCMSX (22 years). TCMSX (0.95) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). TCMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than TCMSX: NRGSX (0) vs TCMSX (250000). TCMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.24 vs. NRGSX (-8.11). TCMSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.08 vs. NRGSX (-23.14).
| NRGSX | TCMSX | NRGSX / TCMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.95 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.425 | 12.341 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 2.08B | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | 14.24 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.69 | 44.02 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.14 | 4.08 | -567% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.53 | 89.30 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers