Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WFSAX
NRGSX vs WFSAX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WFSAX
NRGSX vs WFSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WFSAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and WFSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.51B vs. WFSAX (536M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WFSAX: NRGSX (0.44) vs WFSAX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WFSAX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WFSAX (22 years). WFSAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFSAX: NRGSX (0) vs WFSAX (1000). WFSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.13 vs. NRGSX (-5.23). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -19.58 vs. WFSAX (-51.16).
| NRGSX | WFSAX | NRGSX / WFSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.27 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.002 | 12.939 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.51B | 536M | 1,401% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.23 | 8.13 | -64% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.53 | -1.22 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | -19.58 | -51.16 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.10 | -24.89 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement