Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WFSAX
NRGSX vs WFSAX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WFSAX
NRGSX vs WFSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WFSAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Hold and WFSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 6.95B vs. WFSAX (503M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WFSAX: NRGSX (0.44) vs WFSAX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WFSAX: NRGSX (14 years) vs WFSAX (23 years). WFSAX (1.35) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WFSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFSAX: NRGSX (0) vs WFSAX (1000). WFSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.26 vs. NRGSX (-8.11). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -23.14 vs. WFSAX (-55.42).
| NRGSX | WFSAX | NRGSX / WFSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.27 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.35 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.425 | 5.847 | 195% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.95B | 503M | 1,383% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.11 | -4.26 | 190% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.69 | -4.07 | -66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.14 | -55.42 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.53 | -29.83 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement