Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRGSX vs WSCGX
NRGSX vs WSCGX Comparison
Open Charts NRGSX vs WSCGX
NRGSX vs WSCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRGSX vs. WSCGX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRGSX is a Buy and WSCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 7.39B vs. WSCGX (526M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than WSCGX: NRGSX (0.45) vs WSCGX (0.00). NRGSX was incepted earlier than WSCGX: NRGSX (13 years) vs WSCGX (18 years). WSCGX (1.04) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). WSCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. NRGSX (23.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WSCGX: NRGSX (0) vs WSCGX (1000000). WSCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.25 vs. NRGSX (-1.20). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -18.93 vs. WSCGX (-43.54).
| NRGSX | WSCGX | NRGSX / WSCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.94 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 1.04 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.543 | 12.007 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.39B | 526M | 1,405% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.20 | 8.25 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.14 | 8.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.93 | -43.54 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.86 | -12.51 | -103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement