Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRLCX vs RWMHX
NRLCX vs RWMHX Comparison
Open Charts NRLCX vs RWMHX
NRLCX vs RWMHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRLCX vs. RWMHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRLCX is a Buy and RWMHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMHX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NRLCX (10.1B). NRLCX pays higher dividends than RWMHX: NRLCX (1.46) vs RWMHX (1.35). NRLCX was incepted earlier than RWMHX: NRLCX (7 years) vs RWMHX (11 years). NRLCX (0.50) is less costly to investors than RWMHX (0.41). NRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 106.00 vs. RWMHX (29.00). NRLCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMHX: NRLCX (0) vs RWMHX (250). NRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.40 vs. RWMHX (5.64). NRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.97 vs. RWMHX (27.46).
| NRLCX | RWMHX | NRLCX / RWMHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.41 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.41 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.795 | 3.801 | 521% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.1B | 219B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.35 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.40 | 5.64 | 486% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.83 | 28.74 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.97 | 27.46 | 193% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 76.53 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement