Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRSRX vs RWEBX
NRSRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRSRX vs RWEBX
NRSRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRSRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRSRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NRSRX (4.82B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: RWEBX (0.76) vs NRSRX (0.11). NRSRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRSRX (13 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NRSRX (0.59). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: NRSRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.43 vs. RWEBX (4.91). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. RWEBX (24.05).
| NRSRX | RWEBX | NRSRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.06 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.06 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.381 | 3.422 | 479% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.82B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.76 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.43 | 4.91 | 538% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.92 | 26.14 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | 24.05 | 151% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.84 | 70.82 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement