Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRSRX vs RWEBX
NRSRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts NRSRX vs RWEBX
NRSRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRSRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRSRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NRSRX (4.75B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: RWEBX (0.75) vs NRSRX (0.11). NRSRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: NRSRX (13 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than NRSRX (0.59). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: NRSRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.91 vs. RWEBX (7.27). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 38.25 vs. RWEBX (23.58).
| NRSRX | RWEBX | NRSRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.06 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.06 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.646 | 1.220 | 1,201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.75B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 0.75 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.91 | 7.27 | 412% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.09 | 27.51 | 237% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.25 | 23.58 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.76 | 75.86 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement