Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NRSRX vs RWMFX
NRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NRSRX vs RWMFX
NRSRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NRSRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NRSRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NRSRX (4.25B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NRSRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NRSRX (0.11). NRSRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NRSRX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NRSRX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NRSRX (10.00). NRSRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWMFX: NRSRX (0) vs RWMFX (250). NRSRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.20 vs. RWMFX (8.10). NRSRX return over 5 years is better than : 33.93 vs. RWMFX (26.71).
| NRSRX | RWMFX | NRSRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.320 | 5.575 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.25B | 214B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.11 | 1.40 | 8% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.20 | 8.10 | 311% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.17 | 33.11 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.93 | 26.71 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.40 | 85.42 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement