Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBAX vs RWMFX
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBAX vs RWMFX
NSBAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBAX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBAX (6.18B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBAX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NSBAX (0.76). NSBAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBAX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBAX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBAX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBAX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBAX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NSBAX (-6.11). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. NSBAX (22.39).
| NSBAX | RWMFX | NSBAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.039 | 4.508 | 23% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.18B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 1.41 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.11 | 2.09 | -293% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.43 | 30.24 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.39 | 27.39 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.77 | 82.36 | 117% |