Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBFX (6.34B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NSBFX (1.12). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. NSBFX (-0.22). NSBFX (27.06) and RWMFX (26.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.407 | 1.322 | -31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.34B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.22 | 7.03 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.03 | 30.20 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.06 | 26.38 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.68 | 82.33 | 126% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement