Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NSBFX (6.36B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.44) vs NSBFX (1.07). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. NSBFX (-1.94). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. NSBFX (25.32).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.350 | 3.858 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.36B | 219B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.44 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.94 | 5.76 | -34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.88 | 29.17 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.32 | 28.02 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.10 | 77.65 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers