Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBFX (6.18B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NSBFX (1.04). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NSBFX (-5.72). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. NSBFX (24.52).
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.286 | 4.508 | 29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.18B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 1.41 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.72 | 2.09 | -274% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.72 | 30.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.52 | 27.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.08 | 82.36 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers