Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBFX vs RWMFX
NSBFX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBFX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBFX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 214B vs. NSBFX (6.47B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBFX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NSBFX (1.12). NSBFX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBFX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBFX (0.61) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBFX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBFX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBFX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.92 vs. NSBFX (0.63). NSBFX (27.49) and RWMFX (26.49) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSBFX | RWMFX | NSBFX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.31 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.620 | 5.991 | 10% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.47B | 214B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 1.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | 7.92 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.70 | 33.64 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.49 | 26.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.00 | 86.15 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement