Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSBRX vs RWMFX
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NSBRX vs RWMFX
NSBRX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSBRX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSBRX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NSBRX (6.31B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NSBRX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NSBRX (1.07). NSBRX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NSBRX (20 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NSBRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NSBRX (12.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSBRX: RWMFX (250) vs NSBRX (100000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.16 vs. NSBRX (-2.88). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 26.42 vs. NSBRX (23.10).
| NSBRX | RWMFX | NSBRX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.31 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.877 | 5.436 | -35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.31B | 218B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.88 | 11.16 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.79 | 31.31 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.10 | 26.42 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.60 | 85.87 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement