Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$22.26
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets463.7M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. NSEIX (464M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.81) vs RMEBX (1.12). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (28.42). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. NSEIX (7.04). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. NSEIX (40.55).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.309 | 9.495 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 464M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.12 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.04 | 11.31 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.52 | 28.70 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.55 | 60.65 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.84 | 77.57 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement