Ad is loading...
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$20.17
Change-$0.57 (-2.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets429.89M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$52.50
Change-$1.36 (-2.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets98.3B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 98.3B vs. NSEIX (430M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.84) vs RMEBX (1.18). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (31 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (11.98). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.97 vs. NSEIX (-0.84). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.93 vs. NSEIX (38.31).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.203 | -1.628 | 258% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 98.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.18 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.84 | 2.97 | -28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 6.69 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.31 | 53.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.30 | 55.39 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers