Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
Nicholas Equity Income I
Price$21.24
Change+$0.18 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets440.23M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$57.95
Change+$0.31 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.22B
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. NSEIX (440M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.88) vs RMEBX (1.16). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (32 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NSEIX (11.98). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. NSEIX (1.18). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.55 vs. NSEIX (26.58).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.260 | 5.842 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 440M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.16 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 8.87 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.35 | 17.32 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.58 | 50.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.62 | 68.95 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers