Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts NSEIX vs RMEBX
NSEIX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSEIX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSEIX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. NSEIX (458M). NSEIX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: NSEIX (1.57) vs RMEBX (0.99). NSEIX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: NSEIX (33 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than NSEIX (0.70). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. NSEIX (13.72). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSEIX: RMEBX (250) vs NSEIX (500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.96 vs. NSEIX (3.60). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.98 vs. NSEIX (16.39).
| NSEIX | RMEBX | NSEIX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.144 | 7.547 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500 | 250 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 458M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 0.99 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 3.96 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.23 | 33.39 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.39 | 33.98 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.12 | 90.53 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement