Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSFGX vs RFFTX
NSFGX vs RFFTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSFGX vs. RFFTX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSFGX is a Hold and RFFTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFFTX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. NSFGX (8.43M). NSFGX pays higher dividends than RFFTX: NSFGX (2.09) vs RFFTX (1.83). NSFGX was incepted earlier than RFFTX: NSFGX (8 years) vs RFFTX (16 years). NSFGX (1.30) is less costly to investors than RFFTX (0.34). NSFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RFFTX (7.00). RFFTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NSFGX: RFFTX (250) vs NSFGX (1000000). RFFTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.40 vs. NSFGX (-13.24). RFFTX return over 5 years is better than : 38.26 vs. NSFGX (-2.36).
| NSFGX | RFFTX | NSFGX / RFFTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.34 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 0.34 | 382% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.852 | 10.977 | -126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 52.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 1.83 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.24 | 13.40 | -99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.16 | 34.58 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.36 | 38.26 | -6% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 69.89 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement