Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNAX vs WCMLX
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNAX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth A
Price$48.94
Change-$0.39 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets455.85M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.95
Change-$0.06 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.74M
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNAX has more cash in the bank: 456M vs. WCMLX (43.7M). NSNAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNAX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSNAX (1.53). NSNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.57 vs. WCMLX (6.46). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 15.95 vs. NSNAX (11.69).
| NSNAX | WCMLX | NSNAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.79 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.081 | 1.166 | 7% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 456M | 43.7M | 1,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.57 | 6.46 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.41 | 12.74 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.69 | 15.95 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.41 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement