Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNAX vs WCMLX
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNAX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth A
Price$52.41
Change+$0.52 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNAX has more cash in the bank: 506M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). NSNAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNAX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSNAX (1.53). NSNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.82 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). NSNAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.42 vs. WCMLX (-0.83).
| NSNAX | WCMLX | NSNAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.79 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.275 | 1.788 | 295% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 41.3M | 1,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.82 | -3.04 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.47 | 21.43 | 189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.42 | -0.83 | -410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.14 | N/A | - |