Ad is loading...
NSNAX vs WCMLX
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNAX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth A
Price$41.39
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets385.67M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change+$0.10 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets38.8M
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNAX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNAX has more cash in the bank: 386M vs. WCMLX (38.8M). NSNAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNAX (16 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NSNAX (1.53). NSNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). NSNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.98 vs. WCMLX (-12.36). WCMLX (23.25) and NSNAX (22.84) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSNAX | WCMLX | NSNAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 1.86 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.932 | -16.719 | 89% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 386M | 38.8M | 995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.98 | -12.36 | 32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.59 | -8.07 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.84 | 23.25 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...