Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNAX vs WCMLX
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNAX vs WCMLX
NSNAX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNAX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNAX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNAX has more cash in the bank: 632M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NSNAX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNAX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNAX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSNAX (1.50). NSNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NSNAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNAX (1000) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NSNAX (2.51). NSNAX return over 5 years is better than : -4.69 vs. WCMLX (-7.51).
| NSNAX | WCMLX | NSNAX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.99 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.491 | 3.852 | 143% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 100000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632M | 47.2M | 1,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.51 | 2.81 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.73 | 23.40 | 183% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.69 | -7.51 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement