Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNRX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3
Price$51.81
Change+$0.51 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.52M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.26M
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNRX has more cash in the bank: 506M vs. WCMLX (41.3M). NSNRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNRX (16 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) and NSNRX (1.77) have similar cost to investors . NSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.08 vs. WCMLX (-3.04). NSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 2.08 vs. WCMLX (-0.83).
| NSNRX | WCMLX | NSNRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.99 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.79 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.037 | 1.788 | 282% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 506M | 41.3M | 1,225% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | -3.04 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.40 | 21.43 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.08 | -0.83 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.20 | N/A | - |