Ad is loading...
NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNRX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R3
Price$42.33
Change+$0.77 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets398.48M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.28
Change+$0.27 (+2.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.35M
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNRX has more cash in the bank: 398M vs. WCMLX (39.3M). NSNRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNRX (16 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) and NSNRX (1.77) have similar cost to investors . NSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). NSNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.42 vs. WCMLX (-10.85). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 25.40 vs. NSNRX (20.21).
| NSNRX | WCMLX | NSNRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.99 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.86 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.906 | -14.386 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 398M | 39.3M | 1,013% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.42 | -10.85 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.37 | -5.33 | -120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.21 | 25.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...