Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNRX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNRX has more cash in the bank: 632M vs. WCMLX (47.2M). NSNRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNRX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) and NSNRX (1.74) have similar cost to investors . NSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NSNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.81 vs. NSNRX (2.17). NSNRX return over 5 years is better than : -5.98 vs. WCMLX (-7.51).
| NSNRX | WCMLX | NSNRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.99 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.79 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.300 | 3.852 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 632M | 47.2M | 1,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.17 | 2.81 | 77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.53 | 23.40 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.98 | -7.51 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement