Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSNRX vs WCMLX
NSNRX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSNRX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSNRX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSNRX has more cash in the bank: 683M vs. WCMLX (53.1M). NSNRX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSNRX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSNRX (17 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) and NSNRX (1.74) have similar cost to investors . NSNRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NSNRX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSNRX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.02 vs. WCMLX (25.56). NSNRX return over 5 years is better than : 13.91 vs. WCMLX (0.33).
| NSNRX | WCMLX | NSNRX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.99 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.74 | 1.79 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.960 | 10.683 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 53.1M | 1,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.02 | 25.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.24 | 33.71 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.91 | 0.33 | 4,224% |
| Returns for 10 years | 133.12 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement