Ad is loading...
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$42.33
Change-$2.39 (-5.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets410.53M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$10.81
Change-$0.86 (-7.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.58M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 411M vs. WCMLX (41.6M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.12 vs. WCMLX (-9.95). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. NSRSX (56.94).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.86 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.810 | -9.253 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 411M | 41.6M | 988% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.12 | -9.95 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.65 | -6.42 | -88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.94 | 62.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...