Ad is loading...
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$51.79
Change+$0.74 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets476.63M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.78
Change+$0.21 (+1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.34M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 477M vs. WCMLX (42.3M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (6 years) vs WCMLX (5 years). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.00 vs. WCMLX (48.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.03 vs. WCMLX (10.78). NSRSX return over 5 years is better than : 31.15 vs. WCMLX (28.63).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.815 | 5.521 | 33% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 477M | 42.3M | 1,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.03 | 10.78 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.52 | 10.33 | 228% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.15 | 28.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers