Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$51.52
Change+$0.26 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.98M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$13.61
Change+$0.07 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.77M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 461M vs. WCMLX (44.8M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.52 vs. NSRSX (2.27). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 16.52 vs. NSRSX (14.63).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.234 | 5.288 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 461M | 44.8M | 1,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.27 | 3.52 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.37 | 20.57 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.63 | 16.52 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement