Ad is loading...
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$45.43
Change+$0.45 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets420.59M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$11.80
Change+$0.13 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.14M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 421M vs. WCMLX (42.1M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.86) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.11 vs. WCMLX (-6.86). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 21.31 vs. NSRSX (20.19).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.86 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.291 | -9.253 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 421M | 42.1M | 1,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.11 | -6.86 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.85 | 15.89 | 188% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.19 | 21.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...