Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth R6
Price$49.28
Change+$0.49 (+1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets446.66M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$12.70
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.42M
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. WCMLX (42.4M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (7 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.04). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 131.00 vs. WCMLX (83.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.06 vs. WCMLX (-6.05). WCMLX (18.23) and NSRSX (17.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.79 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.692 | -2.177 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 447M | 42.4M | 1,054% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.06 | -6.05 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.15 | 21.31 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.57 | 18.23 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers