Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 665M vs. WCMLX (51.9M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (8 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.01). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.02 vs. NSRSX (15.46). NSRSX return over 5 years is better than : 9.36 vs. WCMLX (3.16).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.79 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.963 | 11.410 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 665M | 51.9M | 1,281% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.46 | 17.02 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.46 | 32.50 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.36 | 3.16 | 296% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers