Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NSRSX vs WCMLX
NSRSX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NSRSX vs. WCMLX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSRSX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NSRSX has more cash in the bank: 683M vs. WCMLX (52.4M). NSRSX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NSRSX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NSRSX (8 years) vs WCMLX (7 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NSRSX (1.01). NSRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. WCMLX (89.00). NSRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: NSRSX (0) vs WCMLX (100000). NSRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 32.22 vs. WCMLX (25.84). NSRSX return over 5 years is better than : 18.39 vs. WCMLX (-0.07).
| NSRSX | WCMLX | NSRSX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.81 | 0.99 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.79 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.305 | 9.375 | 217% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 683M | 52.4M | 1,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 32.22 | 25.84 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.07 | 32.13 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.39 | -0.07 | -27,691% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement