NSTS
Price
$12.50
Change
+$0.19 (+1.54%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
50.71M
SMBK
Price
$34.79
Change
-$0.74 (-2.08%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
347.08M
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NSTS vs SMBK

Header iconNSTS vs SMBK Comparison
Open Charts NSTS vs SMBKBanner chart's image
NSTS Ban
Price$12.50
Change+$0.19 (+1.54%)
Volume$608
Capitalization50.71M
SmartFinancial
Price$34.79
Change-$0.74 (-2.08%)
Volume$40.9K
Capitalization347.08M
NSTS vs SMBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSTS vs. SMBK commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSTS is a Hold and SMBK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (NSTS: $12.50 vs. SMBK: $34.79)
Brand notoriety: NSTS and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSTS: 14% vs. SMBK: 83%
Market capitalization -- NSTS: $50.71M vs. SMBK: $347.08M
NSTS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.71M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $347.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBK is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMBK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NSTS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBK($347M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than SMBK: NSTS (175.44) vs SMBK (12.09). SMBK YTD gains are higher at: 12.554 vs. NSTS (5.932). NSTS has less debt than SMBK: NSTS (32.8M) vs SMBK (50.1M). SMBK has higher revenues than NSTS: SMBK (152M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
NSTSSMBKNSTS / SMBK
Capitalization50.7M347M15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.93212.55447%
P/E Ratio175.4412.091,451%
Revenue4.95M152M3%
Total CashN/A63M-
Total Debt32.8M50.1M65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
26
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
26
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OIGIX33.13-0.38
-1.13%
Invesco Oppenheimer International Gr R6
AIGIX19.96-0.30
-1.48%
Alger International Opportunities I
MNNYX63.57-1.10
-1.70%
Victory Munder Multi-Cap Y
EKJYX13.10-0.42
-3.11%
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr Inst
PAHSX7.09-0.24
-3.27%
PGIM Jennison NextGeneration Glb Opps A

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
+1.54%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
BCH - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CCB - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with MBWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then MBWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
-2.08%
MBWM - SMBK
79%
Closely correlated
-1.63%
PEBO - SMBK
79%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
FMBH - SMBK
79%
Closely correlated
-1.33%
BY - SMBK
78%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
SHBI - SMBK
78%
Closely correlated
-3.89%
More