NSTS
Price
$9.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
SMBK
Price
$29.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
33 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NSTS vs SMBK

Header iconNSTS vs SMBK Comparison
Open Charts NSTS vs SMBKBanner chart's image
NSTS Ban
Price$9.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$18.72K
CapitalizationN/A
SmartFinancial
Price$29.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.13K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NSTS vs SMBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
NSTS vs. SMBK commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSTS is a Buy and SMBK is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NSTS: $9.52 vs. SMBK: $29.40)
Brand notoriety: NSTS and SMBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSTS: 316% vs. SMBK: 108%
Market capitalization -- NSTS: $50.71M vs. SMBK: $347.08M
NSTS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.71M. SMBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $347.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBK’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMBK is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMBK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NSTS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.86% price change this week, while SMBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

SMBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBK($347M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than SMBK: NSTS (175.44) vs SMBK (12.09). SMBK YTD gains are higher at: 21.257 vs. NSTS (0.105). NSTS has less debt than SMBK: NSTS (32.8M) vs SMBK (50.1M). SMBK has higher revenues than NSTS: SMBK (152M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
NSTSSMBKNSTS / SMBK
Capitalization50.7M347M15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.10521.2570%
P/E Ratio175.4412.091,451%
Revenue4.95M152M3%
Total CashN/A63M-
Total Debt32.8M50.1M65%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMBK: Fundamental Ratings
SMBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
32
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BPSIX28.590.22
+0.78%
Boston Partners Small Cap Value II I
VSCCX15.510.09
+0.58%
JPMorgan Small Cap Blend C
AZMIX15.280.06
+0.39%
Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Ins
JTKNX14.58N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Thematic Opps NAV
FRUAX24.59-0.04
-0.16%
Franklin Utilities Adv

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
-0.31%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
BCH - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
CCB - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More

SMBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBK has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBK jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBK
1D Price
Change %
SMBK100%
+0.75%
FMBH - SMBK
81%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
SHBI - SMBK
80%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
BUSE - SMBK
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
QCRH - SMBK
80%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
OCFC - SMBK
79%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
More