NSTS
Price
$12.50
Change
+$0.19 (+1.54%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
50.71M
UBCP
Price
$13.00
Change
+$0.10 (+0.78%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
82.52M
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NSTS vs UBCP

Header iconNSTS vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts NSTS vs UBCPBanner chart's image
NSTS Ban
Price$12.50
Change+$0.19 (+1.54%)
Volume$608
Capitalization50.71M
United Ban
Price$13.00
Change+$0.10 (+0.78%)
Volume$2.64K
Capitalization82.52M
NSTS vs UBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSTS vs. UBCP commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSTS is a Hold and UBCP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (NSTS: $12.50 vs. UBCP: $13.00)
Brand notoriety: NSTS and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSTS: 14% vs. UBCP: 51%
Market capitalization -- NSTS: $50.71M vs. UBCP: $82.52M
NSTS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.71M. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UBCP’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UBCP’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

NSTS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.64% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

UBCP is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBCP($82.5M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than UBCP: NSTS (175.44) vs UBCP (9.46). NSTS YTD gains are higher at: 5.932 vs. UBCP (0.000). NSTS has less debt than UBCP: NSTS (32.8M) vs UBCP (102M). UBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: UBCP (29.9M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
NSTSUBCPNSTS / UBCP
Capitalization50.7M82.5M61%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.9320.000-
P/E Ratio175.449.461,855%
Revenue4.95M29.9M17%
Total CashN/A7.95M-
Total Debt32.8M102M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
68
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
UBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
UBCP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRMDX13.68-0.09
-0.65%
Heartland Mid Cap Value Investor
JHFEX12.81-0.12
-0.93%
JHancock Fundamental Equity Inc I
ESPTX10.85-0.11
-1.00%
UBS International Sustainable Equity P2
MUETX36.11-0.63
-1.71%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity R3
ASLGX127.85-2.84
-2.17%
American Century Select R5

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with PFIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then PFIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
+1.54%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
BCH - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
CCB - NSTS
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.08%
More

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBCP and TFC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBCP and TFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
+0.78%
TFC - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.12%
NSTS - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
BSBK - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
BKSC - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
CMA - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.37%
More