NSTS
Price
$12.36
Change
-$0.04 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
50.71M
UBCP
Price
$13.64
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
82.52M
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NSTS vs UBCP

Header iconNSTS vs UBCP Comparison
Open Charts NSTS vs UBCPBanner chart's image
NSTS Ban
Price$12.36
Change-$0.04 (-0.32%)
Volume$8.3K
Capitalization50.71M
United Ban
Price$13.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Volume$4.48K
Capitalization82.52M
NSTS vs UBCP Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NSTS vs. UBCP commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NSTS is a StrongBuy and UBCP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NSTS: $12.36 vs. UBCP: $13.64)
Brand notoriety: NSTS and UBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NSTS: 198% vs. UBCP: 128%
Market capitalization -- NSTS: $50.71M vs. UBCP: $82.52M
NSTS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $50.71M. UBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $82.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NSTS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NSTS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UBCP is a better buy in the long-term than NSTS.

Price Growth

NSTS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.07% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

NSTS is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

UBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.57% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBCP($82.5M) has a higher market cap than NSTS($50.7M). NSTS has higher P/E ratio than UBCP: NSTS (175.44) vs UBCP (9.46). UBCP YTD gains are higher at: 7.745 vs. NSTS (4.714). NSTS has less debt than UBCP: NSTS (32.8M) vs UBCP (102M). UBCP has higher revenues than NSTS: UBCP (29.9M) vs NSTS (4.95M).
NSTSUBCPNSTS / UBCP
Capitalization50.7M82.5M61%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.7147.74561%
P/E Ratio175.449.461,855%
Revenue4.95M29.9M17%
Total CashN/A7.95M-
Total Debt32.8M102M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UBCP: Fundamental Ratings
UBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
16
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LAFCX19.39N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Affiliated C
BMSDX14.01N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq C
YFSIX15.97N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Global I
BILSX9.61N/A
N/A
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins
ARIQX10.22N/A
N/A
Aristotle Value Eq I

NSTS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSTS has been loosely correlated with FULTP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NSTS jumps, then FULTP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSTS
1D Price
Change %
NSTS100%
-0.31%
FULTP - NSTS
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
FGBIP - NSTS
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.80%
PFIS - NSTS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
SMBK - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.34%
HBCP - NSTS
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

UBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UBCP and BSBK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UBCP and BSBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBCP
1D Price
Change %
UBCP100%
+0.07%
BSBK - UBCP
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
TFC - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
NSTS - UBCP
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
BKSC - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CMA - UBCP
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
More