Advertisement
BSBK vs UBCP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BSBK is a Hold and UBCP is a Buy.
BSBK | UBCP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 65 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UBCP's Valuation (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSBK (93) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew significantly faster than BSBK’s over the last 12 months.
UBCP's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BSBK (100) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than BSBK’s over the last 12 months.
UBCP's SMR Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSBK (85) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to BSBK’s over the last 12 months.
UBCP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BSBK (51) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew similarly to BSBK’s over the last 12 months.
UBCP's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BSBK (99) in the null industry. This means that UBCP’s stock grew significantly faster than BSBK’s over the last 12 months.
| BSBK | UBCP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% | 1 day ago 43% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 41% | 1 day ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 32% | 1 day ago 46% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% | 1 day ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 32% | 7 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 41% | 11 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 34% | 1 day ago 69% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BSBK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while UBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BSBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BSBK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BSBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BSBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while UBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.20% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.80%.
Reported Earning Dates
BSBK is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
UBCP is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Regional Banks (-2.05% weekly)Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| UCO | 52.16 | 1.53 | +3.02% |
| ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) | |||
| ODHY | 9.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Obra Defensive High Yield ETF (ODHY) | |||
| NOVZ | 47.85 | -0.30 | -0.62% |
| TrueShares Structured Outcome (November) ETF (NOVZ) | |||
| IVVB | 35.53 | -0.23 | -0.64% |
| iShares Large Cap Deep Quarterly Laddered ETF (IVVB) | |||
| DFEV | 42.60 | -0.81 | -1.87% |
| Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) | |||
BSBK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BSBK has been loosely correlated with FHN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BSBK jumps, then FHN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BSBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSBK | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| FHN - BSBK | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| COLB - BSBK | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.67% | ||
| UBCP - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | -4.13% | ||
| WSFS - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| WTFC - BSBK | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.68% | ||
More | ||||
UBCP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBCP has been loosely correlated with BSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UBCP jumps, then BSBK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To UBCP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBCP | 100% | -4.13% | ||
| BSBK - UBCP | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| MGYR - UBCP | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ALRS - UBCP | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.34% | ||
| MBWM - UBCP | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| BAFN - UBCP | 24% Poorly correlated | -7.46% | ||
More | ||||