Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NTBIX vs WCFRX
NTBIX vs WCFRX Comparison
Open Charts NTBIX vs WCFRX
NTBIX vs WCFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NTBIX vs. WCFRX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTBIX is a Hold and WCFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTBIX has more cash in the bank: 7.19B vs. WCFRX (82.7M). WCFRX pays higher dividends than NTBIX: WCFRX (6.80) vs NTBIX (4.11). NTBIX was incepted earlier than WCFRX: NTBIX (12 years) vs WCFRX (9 years). WCFRX (1.66) is less costly to investors than NTBIX (1.05). WCFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 126.00 vs. NTBIX (44.00). WCFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTBIX: WCFRX (2500) vs NTBIX (25000). NTBIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. WCFRX (2.35). NTBIX return over 5 years is better than : 9.81 vs. WCFRX (4.09).
| NTBIX | WCFRX | NTBIX / WCFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.66 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.748 | 1.449 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 2500 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.19B | 82.7M | 8,694% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.11 | 6.80 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 2.35 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.20 | 16.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.81 | 4.09 | 240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers