Advertisement
NTRP vs TOUR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTRP is a Hold and TOUR is a Hold.
NTRP | TOUR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 1 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TOUR's Valuation (1) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (65) in the null industry. This means that TOUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
TOUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that TOUR’s stock grew similarly to NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
TOUR's SMR Rating (85) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that TOUR’s stock grew similarly to NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
NTRP's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as TOUR (59) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that NTRP’s stock grew similarly to TOUR’s over the last 12 months.
TOUR's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTRP (100) in the null industry. This means that TOUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTRP’s over the last 12 months.
| NTRP | TOUR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NTRP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TOUR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NTRP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TOUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NTRP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOUR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NTRP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TOUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NTRP (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +2.67% price change this week, while TOUR (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -3.88% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
NTRP is expected to report earnings on Oct 13, 2026.
TOUR is expected to report earnings on Dec 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Consumer Sundries (+2.37% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KORU | 21.09 | 1.07 | +5.34% |
| Direxion Daily MSCI South Korea Bull 3X ETF (KORU) | |||
| TSLZ | 12.28 | 0.05 | +0.41% |
| T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) | |||
| BSJU | 24.93 | 0.06 | +0.24% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2030 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJU) | |||
| MHIP | 20.62 | N/A | N/A |
| Milliman Healthcare Inflation Plus ETF (MHIP) | |||
| FFND | 31.98 | -0.09 | -0.28% |
| One Global ETF (FFND) | |||
NTRP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NTRP and BKNG have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTRP and BKNG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTRP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTRP | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| BKNG - NTRP | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
| LIND - NTRP | 7% Poorly correlated | +7.00% | ||
| EJH - NTRP | 6% Poorly correlated | +26.06% | ||
| FTDR - NTRP | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.19% | ||
| TOUR - NTRP | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.20% | ||
More | ||||
TOUR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TOUR and MED have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOUR and MED's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TOUR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOUR | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| MED - TOUR | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| PRSU - TOUR | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.45% | ||
| MMYT - TOUR | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.17% | ||
| EXPE - TOUR | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SABR - TOUR | 20% Poorly correlated | -6.13% | ||
More | ||||