NTZ
Price
$3.38
Change
-$0.19 (-5.32%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
37.23M
PATK
Price
$103.60
Change
+$1.27 (+1.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.45B
25 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NTZ vs PATK

Header iconNTZ vs PATK Comparison
Open Charts NTZ vs PATKBanner chart's image
Natuzzi SpA
Price$3.38
Change-$0.19 (-5.32%)
Volume$1.39K
Capitalization37.23M
Patrick Industries
Price$103.60
Change+$1.27 (+1.24%)
Volume$214.94K
Capitalization3.45B
NTZ vs PATK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NTZ vs. PATK commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NTZ is a Buy and PATK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NTZ: $3.38 vs. PATK: $103.60)
Brand notoriety: NTZ and PATK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NTZ: 23% vs. PATK: 70%
Market capitalization -- NTZ: $37.23M vs. PATK: $3.45B
NTZ [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $37.23M. PATK’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $3.45B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NTZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePATK’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PATK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PATK is a better buy in the long-term than NTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PATK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PATK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NTZ is a better buy in the short-term than PATK.

Price Growth

NTZ (@Home Furnishings) experienced а -3.84% price change this week, while PATK (@Home Furnishings) price change was -2.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

PATK is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-2.77% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PATK($3.45B) has a higher market cap than NTZ($37.2M). PATK YTD gains are higher at: 26.242 vs. NTZ (-29.583). PATK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 412M vs. NTZ (-12.76M). PATK has higher revenues than NTZ: PATK (3.82B) vs NTZ (328M).
NTZPATKNTZ / PATK
Capitalization37.2M3.45B1%
EBITDA-12.76M412M-3%
Gain YTD-29.58326.242-113%
P/E RatioN/A28.15-
Revenue328M3.82B9%
Total CashN/A22M-
Total DebtN/A1.47B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NTZ vs PATK: Fundamental Ratings
NTZ
PATK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9048
SMR RATING
1..100
9767
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10017
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PATK's Valuation (32) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as NTZ (64) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (90) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's SMR Rating (67) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as NTZ (97) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as NTZ (61) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

PATK's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTZ (100) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that PATK’s stock grew significantly faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NTZPATK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PATK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRC14.620.11
+0.76%
MRC Global
HON208.190.49
+0.24%
Honeywell International
TXNM56.63-0.02
-0.04%
TXNM Energy Inc
ACB4.86-0.09
-1.82%
Aurora Cannabis
OMCC5.35-0.30
-5.31%
Old Market Capital Corporation

NTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTZ and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTZ and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTZ
1D Price
Change %
NTZ100%
N/A
CRWS - NTZ
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
PATK - NTZ
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.24%
SN - NTZ
17%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
LEG - NTZ
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ETD - NTZ
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
More

PATK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PATK has been loosely correlated with MHK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PATK jumps, then MHK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PATK
1D Price
Change %
PATK100%
+1.24%
MHK - PATK
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
ETD - PATK
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.06%
LZB - PATK
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.53%
AMWD - PATK
58%
Loosely correlated
+6.16%
MBC - PATK
56%
Loosely correlated
+6.05%
More