NUFMF
Price
$1.41
Change
-$0.05 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
SBMSF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
88.4M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NUFMF vs SBMSF

Header iconNUFMF vs SBMSF Comparison
Open Charts NUFMF vs SBMSFBanner chart's image
NuFarm
Price$1.41
Change-$0.05 (-3.42%)
Volume$5.1K
Capitalization1.37B
Danakali
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.1K
Capitalization88.4M
NUFMF vs SBMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NUFMF vs. SBMSF commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NUFMF is a Hold and SBMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NUFMF: $1.41 vs. SBMSF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: NUFMF and SBMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Agricultural industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NUFMF: 668% vs. SBMSF: 25%
Market capitalization -- NUFMF: $1.37B vs. SBMSF: $88.4M
NUFMF [@Chemicals: Agricultural] is valued at $1.37B. SBMSF’s [@Chemicals: Agricultural] market capitalization is $88.4M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry ranges from $40.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Agricultural] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NUFMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NUFMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NUFMF and SBMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

NUFMF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -9.03% price change this week, while SBMSF (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -6.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBMSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Agricultural (-0.01% weekly)

The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NUFMF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than SBMSF($88.4M). NUFMF YTD gains are higher at: -38.696 vs. SBMSF (-52.320). NUFMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 425M vs. SBMSF (-4.81M). NUFMF has more cash in the bank: 687M vs. SBMSF (22.9M). NUFMF has higher revenues than SBMSF: NUFMF (3.73B) vs SBMSF (18.2K).
NUFMFSBMSFNUFMF / SBMSF
Capitalization1.37B88.4M1,550%
EBITDA425M-4.81M-8,833%
Gain YTD-38.696-52.32074%
P/E Ratio18.42N/A-
Revenue3.73B18.2K20,505,495%
Total Cash687M22.9M3,000%
Total Debt1.13BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NUFMF vs SBMSF: Fundamental Ratings
NUFMF
SBMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7830
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9580
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
288
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBMSF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (51). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (100). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NUFMF (95). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew similarly to NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

SBMSF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NUFMF (96). This means that SBMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NUFMF’s over the last 12 months.

NUFMF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SBMSF (88). This means that NUFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than SBMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLNG3.680.01
+0.27%
Dynagas LNG Parners LP
RGEN126.770.22
+0.17%
Repligen Corp
IRMD60.68-0.10
-0.16%
iRadimed Corp
LAUR22.26-0.28
-1.24%
Laureate Education
DUO0.19-0.02
-9.71%
Fangdd Network Group Ltd

NUFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUFMF and SEED have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUFMF and SEED's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUFMF
1D Price
Change %
NUFMF100%
-3.42%
SEED - NUFMF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
VRDR - NUFMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
MGROF - NUFMF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
YARIY - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
PUBC - NUFMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SBMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBMSF and CBLUF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBMSF and CBLUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBMSF
1D Price
Change %
SBMSF100%
-6.25%
CBLUF - SBMSF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YRAIF - SBMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VRDR - SBMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
YARIY - SBMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
NUFMF - SBMSF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
More