NVDX
Price
$21.43
Change
+$0.48 (+2.29%)
Updated
Sep 4, 01:07 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
438.89M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QLD
Price
$90.70
Change
+$0.32 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.82B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NVDX vs QLD

NVDX vs QLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 26, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? T-Rex 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) vs. ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

Key Takeaways

  • NVDX provides 2x daily exposure to a single stock, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), while QLD delivers 2x daily exposure to the broad Nasdaq-100 Index.
  • NVDX carries higher concentration risk due to its single-stock mandate, whereas QLD offers diversification across approximately 100 large-cap growth companies.
  • Both ETFs employ leveraged strategies with expense ratios of 1.05% for NVDX and 0.95% for QLD, making cost efficiency a key differentiator.
  • NVDX targets the semiconductor sector exclusively through NVDA, while QLD captures broader technology, consumer discretionary, and communication services exposure.
  • Structural differences in rebalancing and compounding effects make NVDX suitable for short-term tactical views and QLD appropriate for leveraged sector rotation within growth equities.
  • Liquidity profiles favor QLD with significantly higher assets under management (AUM) and trading volume compared to the more specialized NVDX.

Introduction

Investors seeking amplified exposure to technology and growth themes often evaluate leveraged ETFs as tactical tools. NVDX and QLD both target 200% daily performance but pursue distinct strategies: one concentrates on a single semiconductor leader, and the other magnifies a diversified basket of Nasdaq-100 constituents. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they offer complementary or alternative leveraged exposure within the technology sector for investors with differing risk tolerances and time horizons.

T-Rex 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) Overview

NVDX seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of NVDA. Launched in October 2023, the fund employs swap agreements and other derivatives to achieve its leveraged objective. It maintains a limited number of holdings, primarily cash equivalents and total return swaps tied to NVDA. The strategy is passive and non-diversified, with an expense ratio of 1.05%. NVDX resets leverage daily, making it structurally distinct from buy-and-hold products and subject to compounding effects over multiple periods.

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) Overview

QLD seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, of 200% of the daily performance of the Nasdaq-100 Index. Established in 2006, the fund uses swaps, futures, and other derivatives to deliver leveraged exposure across roughly 100 large-cap non-financial companies. Top holdings typically include technology leaders such as NVDA, Apple Inc. (AAPL), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), and Meta Platforms Inc. (META). The fund maintains a net expense ratio of 0.95% and resets its leverage daily, consistent with other leveraged products.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the technology sector, driven by semiconductor innovation, artificial intelligence adoption, and digital transformation trends. Capital flows into growth equities have accelerated amid earnings strength from leading technology firms and evolving interest rate expectations. Regulatory developments around antitrust and data privacy, alongside macroeconomic factors such as inflation and global supply chains, influence sector momentum. Risks include valuation compression during risk-off periods and heightened volatility from policy shifts or geopolitical tensions affecting technology supply chains.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, NVDX has exhibited amplified moves tied exclusively to NVDA earnings and sector-specific news, resulting in greater volatility than broader leveraged products. QLD has provided leveraged participation in Nasdaq-100 rotations, benefiting from diversification across multiple technology subsectors during periods of broad market strength. Relative positioning highlights NVDX for concentrated semiconductor bets and QLD for diversified growth exposure, with both vehicles subject to the effects of daily rebalancing and compounding over extended holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore opportunities with the AI Screener.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including diversification profile, cost efficiency, and broader sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to QLD for investors seeking leveraged growth exposure across the Nasdaq-100. NVDX remains a specialized instrument for targeted views on NVDA, though its concentrated structure introduces elevated single-name risk relative to the more diversified alternative.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
NVDX vs. QLD commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NVDX is a Buy and QLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QLD has more net assets: 13.8B vs. NVDX (439M). QLD has a higher annual dividend yield than NVDX: QLD (28.475) vs NVDX (22.371). NVDX was incepted earlier than QLD: NVDX (3 years) vs QLD (20 years). QLD (0.95) has a lower expense ratio than NVDX (1.05). QLD has a higher turnover NVDX (0.00) vs NVDX (0.00).
NVDXQLDNVDX / QLD
Gain YTD22.37128.47579%
Net Assets439M13.8B3%
Total Expense Ratio1.050.95111%
Turnover0.0016.00-
Yield0.000.13-
Fund Existence3 years20 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NVDXQLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NVDX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAYM25.440.16
+0.63%
TrueShares S&P Autcll Defesv Inc ETF
KNG51.340.13
+0.25%
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500® Dv Ast Tgt Inc ETF
SAWG24.20N/A
N/A
AAM Sawgrass U.S. Lg Cp Qual Gr ETF
FTHY13.28-0.01
-0.08%
First Trust High Yield Opportunities 2027 Term Fund
FMNY25.88-0.03
-0.11%
First Trust New York High Inc Mncpl ETF