NVS vs NVSEF
To understand the difference between Novartis AG - ADR (NVS) vs. Novartis AG - Ordinary Shares (Registered) (NVSEF) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NVS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileNVSEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- NVS’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- NVSEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NVS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVSEF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NVSEF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
NVS (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а -1.03% price change this week, while NVSEF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -1.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.91%.
Reported Earning Dates
NVS is expected to report earnings on Jan 31, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-2.43% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| NVS | NVSEF | NVS / NVSEF | |
| Capitalization | 198B | 217B | 91% |
| EBITDA | 18.3B | 17.8B | 103% |
| Gain YTD | 1.898 | -2.566 | -74% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.38 | 29.50 | 79% |
| Revenue | 46.7B | 53.1B | 88% |
| Total Cash | 14B | 11.2B | 125% |
| Total Debt | 26.3B | 28.3B | 93% |
NVS | NVSEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 99 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 12 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 25 | 59 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NVSEF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as NVS (13) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that NVSEF’s stock grew similarly to NVS’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVSEF (59) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVSEF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's SMR Rating (22) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NVSEF (22) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to NVSEF’s over the last 12 months.
NVS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry is in the same range as NVSEF (74) in the null industry. This means that NVS’s stock grew similarly to NVSEF’s over the last 12 months.
NVSEF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as NVS (90) in the Pharmaceuticals Major industry. This means that NVSEF’s stock grew similarly to NVS’s over the last 12 months.
| NVS | NVSEF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 46% | 22 days ago 43% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 45% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SJNK | 25.48 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| SPDR® Blmbg ST HY Bd ETF | |||
| BAUG | 44.23 | -0.07 | -0.16% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF Aug | |||
| MGOV | 19.99 | -0.04 | -0.20% |
| First Trust Intermediate Gvt Opps ETF | |||
| HIYS | 25.72 | -0.06 | -0.21% |
| Invesco High Yield Select ETF | |||
| EQAL | 49.82 | -0.46 | -0.91% |
| Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF | |||
NVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NVS has been loosely correlated with AZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NVS jumps, then AZN could also see price increases.
NVSEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NVSEF and SNYNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NVSEF and SNYNF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NVSEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVSEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SNYNF - NVSEF | 27% Poorly correlated | +7.45% | ||
| SNY - NVSEF | 21% Poorly correlated | +6.65% | ||
| NVS - NVSEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| KYKOF - NVSEF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GIKLY - NVSEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
More | ||||