Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMEX
NWABX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMEX
NWABX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMEX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.73B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMEX (1.15) vs NWABX (0.53). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: NWABX (8 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). RWMEX (0.61) and NWABX (0.59) have similar cost to investors . NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMEX (32.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMEX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.71 vs. NWABX (-13.35). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 25.61 vs. NWABX (-6.48).
| NWABX | RWMEX | NWABX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.61 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.787 | 4.265 | 159% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.15 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.35 | 1.71 | -782% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.60 | 28.86 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.48 | 25.61 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.11 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers