Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMEX
NWABX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMEX
NWABX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NWABX (1.54B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMEX (1.18) vs NWABX (0.54). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: NWABX (8 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). RWMEX (0.61) and NWABX (0.59) have similar cost to investors . NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMEX (29.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMEX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.37 vs. NWABX (-8.51). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 26.22 vs. NWABX (-2.99).
| NWABX | RWMEX | NWABX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.61 | 90% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.61 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.837 | 3.658 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.18 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | 5.37 | -159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.90 | 27.81 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.99 | 26.22 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers