Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.53B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.40) vs NWABX (0.58). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.54 vs. NWABX (-5.72). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 30.09 vs. NWABX (-0.51).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.172 | 2.080 | 297% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.53B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.40 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.72 | 8.54 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.41 | 24.40 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.51 | 30.09 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers