Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. NWABX (1.54B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.44) vs NWABX (0.54). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. NWABX (-8.51). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 28.02 vs. NWABX (-2.99).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.837 | 3.858 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.54B | 219B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 1.44 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.51 | 5.76 | -148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.90 | 29.17 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.99 | 28.02 | -11% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.65 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers