Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NWABX vs RWMFX
NWABX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWABX vs. RWMFX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWABX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. NWABX (1.73B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NWABX: RWMFX (1.41) vs NWABX (0.53). NWABX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NWABX (8 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). NWABX (0.59) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). NWABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWMFX (32.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWABX: RWMFX (250) vs NWABX (1000000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.09 vs. NWABX (-13.35). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.39 vs. NWABX (-6.48).
| NWABX | RWMFX | NWABX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.31 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.787 | 4.508 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.73B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.41 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.35 | 2.09 | -640% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.60 | 30.24 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.48 | 27.39 | -24% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 82.36 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers