Ad is loading...
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$16.67
Change-$0.99 (-5.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets172.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.60
Change-$3.86 (-5.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NWADX (172M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGACX (0.09) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.32 vs. RGACX (-0.32). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 68.49 vs. NWADX (59.53).
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.829 | -4.903 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 172M | 280B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.32 | -0.32 | -418% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.28 | 4.15 | 199% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.53 | 68.49 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.41 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...