Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$22.42
Change+$0.25 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.73M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$85.19
Change+$0.60 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. NWADX (228M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGACX (0.07) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.81 vs. RGACX (16.32). RGACX (43.39) and NWADX (42.30) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.710 | 17.502 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 228M | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.81 | 16.32 | 115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 73.07 | 60.40 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.30 | 43.39 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 99.34 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement