Ad is loading...
NWADX vs RGACX
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NWADX vs RGACX
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$18.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.96M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$70.07
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.87B
NWADX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NWADX vs. RGACX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWADX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 286B vs. NWADX (177M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NWADX: RGACX (0.08) vs NWADX (0.00). NWADX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NWADX (7 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: RGACX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.27 vs. RGACX (2.58). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.87 vs. NWADX (39.05).
| NWADX | RGACX | NWADX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.94 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.219 | -2.667 | 196% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 50000 | 250 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 286B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.27 | 2.58 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.10 | 31.70 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.05 | 41.87 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.36 | - |